Iran, MEK, Maryam Rajavi, PMOI, NCRI, Iranian Opposition
الاثنين، 31 يوليو 2017
المقابر الشهداء المجاهدي خلق المجزرة 1988في ايران
Iran, MEK, Maryam Rajavi, PMOI, NCRI, Iranian Opposition
MEK'S POPULARITY AMONG IRANIAN YOUTH, REGIME'S NIGHTMAREMEK'S POPULARITY AMONG IRANIAN YOUTH, REGIME'S NIGHTMARE
 |
MEK'S POPULARITY AMONG IRANIAN YOUTH, REGIME'S NIGHTMARE |
Iran, MEK, Maryam Rajavi, PMOI, NCRI, Iranian Opposition
CONTRARY TO IRAN LOBBY CLAIMS, REGIME CHANGE DOES NOT END IN WAR
One of the great falsehoods of the Iran lobby and the appeasers of the clerical regime in Tehran is that any effort at regime change would inevitably lead to war. This by-line can be seen in every article by the Iran lobby and the appeasers attempting to underscore the growing global support for the Iranian opposition (MEK/PMOI) and the Iranian people’s quest for regime change.
History teaches us though that the longevity of any regime born out of violent conquest is ultimately short-lived.
The Iranian regime that was born out of a revolution overthrowing the Shah, which was in turn hijacked by the mullahs and turned into a religious oligarchy. The original aim of the revolution was the formation of a secular, pluralistic democracy. That dream still exists in the hearts and minds of the overwhelming majority of the Iranian people and resonates in the various forms of protest in Iran, despite the repressive measures by the regime. Therefore, the call for “regime change” is primarily the Iranian people’s demand.
MEK/PMOI Popularity Threat to Iranian Regime's Existance
 |
MEK/PMOI Popularity Threat to Iranian Regime's Existance |
MaryamRajavi, MEK, Iran, FreeIran, PMOI, NCRI, Iranian Opposition
For many associated with the Iranian lobby and appeasers of the clerical regime in Tehran, the best way to prop up the regime is to discredit any alternative options presented to the international community. In addition, the lobby and appeasers continue to stress that regime change will lead to war. As an example, they point to the struggles of the Iraq government since the removal of Saddam by the U.S. and its allies.
However, history teaches us that any regime’s existence is limited when it begins with a violent upheaval. The current Iranian regime was born out of a revolution to end the rule of the Shah, but that revolution’s goal was to create a secular, pluralistic, and democratic Iran. However, the mullahs hijacked the revolution, creating a theocracy and suppressing any alternative political voices, including the MEK/PMOI.
Instead, to consolidate their power, the Iranian regime has relied on the typical tools of oppression, including the creation of a paramilitary and judiciary system that touches every section of Iranian society. The regime, using its lobby and appeasers, have been quick in attacking any publication or personalities that dare to speak up about the quest of the Iranian people to achieve their original dream of a democratic Iran.
Anyone who dares to talk about “regime change” is targeted for repressive measures. The MEK/PMOI have been high on the regime’s list, since the MEK/PMOI are the most dedicated and organized opposition with extensive routes and support at home, with the ability to materialize regime change.
New Iran sanctions succeed where the nuclear deal failed
New Iran sanctions succeed where the nuclear deal failed
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-iran-sanctions-succeed-where-the-nuclear-deal-failed/article/2630184
(Iran, MEK, Maryam Rajavi, PMOI, NCRI, Iranian Opposition)
It is time to bring down the mullahs of Tehran
The unprecedented sanctions passed by House lawmakers last Tuesday and the Senate last Thursday are a milestone achievement in countering the Iranian regime's belligerence and fixing some of the key flaws contained in the nuclear deal hammered between Iran and world powers in 2015.
Under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as the nuclear pact is formally known, Iran was effectively given a free pass on all its non-nuclear activities as long as it committed to limiting, not dismantling, its nuclear program. The JCPOA was the nucleus of the Obama administration's Iran policy.
جنبش دادخواهی، نظام قتل عام را به لرزه در آورده است- پیام مریم رجوی در س...
مريم رجوي حق مردم ايران را از اين رژيم پليد خواهد گرفت
PMOI, MaryamRajavi, MEK, Iran, FreeIran
الأحد، 30 يوليو 2017
MEK/PMOI Popularity Threat to Iranian Regime's Existance
 |
MEK/PMOI Popularity Threat to Iranian Regime's Existance |
The Iranian community demands a change of regime in Iran
MEK, MaryamRajavi, Iran, FreeIran, PMOI,
For many associated with the Iranian lobby and appeasers of the clerical regime in Tehran, the best way to prop up the regime is to discredit any alternative options presented to the international community. In addition, the lobby and appeasers continue to stress that regime change will lead to war. As an example, they point to the struggles of the Iraq government since the removal of Saddam by the U.S. and its allies.
However, history teaches us that any regime’s existence is limited when it begins with a violent upheaval. The current Iranian regime was born out of a revolution to end the rule of the Shah, but that revolution’s goal was to create a secular, pluralistic, and democratic Iran. However, the mullahs hijacked the revolution, creating a theocracy and suppressing any alternative political voices, including the MEK/PMOI.
Instead, to consolidate their power, the Iranian regime has relied on the typical tools of oppression, including the creation of a paramilitary and judiciary system that touches every section of Iranian society. The regime, using its lobby and appeasers, have been quick in attacking any publication or personalities that dare to speak up about the quest of the Iranian people to achieve their original dream of a democratic Iran.
Anyone who dares to talk about “regime change” is targeted for repressive measures. The MEK/PMOI have been high on the regime’s list, since the MEK/PMOI are the most dedicated and organized opposition with extensive routes and support at home, with the ability to materialize regime change.
The people’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) has been the subject of propaganda campaigns by the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) at home and by regime lobbies and appeasers throughout the international community. This campaign is focused on discrediting the MEK/PMOI, by saying there is no democratic alternative to the Iranian regime and that regime change will result in war and increased instability within the region.
But why is the MEK/PMOI being targeted so directly? The MEK/PMOI is the oldest, largest, and most popular resistance movement within Iran. They form the core of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which is a coalition of opposition groups from all sectors of Iran. The PMOI/MEK was founded in September 1965 by three Iranian engineers who wanted to replace the Shah’s dictatorship with a democracy.
MEK'S POPULARITY AMONG IRANIAN YOUTH, REGIME'S NIGHTMARE
 |
MEK'S POPULARITY AMONG IRANIAN YOUTH, REGIME'S NIGHTMARE |
Iran, FreeIran, PMOI, MEK, MaryamRajavi
One of the great falsehoods of the Iran lobby and the appeasers of the clerical regime in Tehran is that any effort at regime change would inevitably lead to war. This by-line can be seen in every article by the Iran lobby and the appeasers attempting to underscore the growing global support for the Iranian opposition (MEK/PMOI) and the Iranian people’s quest for regime change.
History teaches us though that the longevity of any regime born out of violent conquest is ultimately short-lived.
The Iranian regime that was born out of a revolution overthrowing the Shah, which was in turn hijacked by the mullahs and turned into a religious oligarchy. The original aim of the revolution was the formation of a secular, pluralistic democracy. That dream still exists in the hearts and minds of the overwhelming majority of the Iranian people and resonates in the various forms of protest in Iran, despite the repressive measures by the regime. Therefore, the call for “regime change” is primarily the Iranian people’s demand.
Evin Prison: The Iranian regime’s notorious torture factory
 |
Evin Prison: The Iranian regime’s notorious torturefactory |
Iran, FreeIran, MaryamRajavi, MEK, PMOI,
uprising to overthrow it. Such is its paranoia where opposition groups are concerned it has spent the whole period of its existence, eliminating dissenters.
The approach to any form of opposition shows how insecure this regime has become. But as far as extreme brutality is concerned, it could not be more prevalent than that of the regime’s treatment of dissidents at Evin Prison, where guards use torture to humiliate their captives before executing them.
The approach to any form of opposition shows how insecure this regime has become. But as far as extreme brutality is concerned, it could not be more prevalent than that of the regime’s treatment of dissidents at Evin Prison, where guards use torture to humiliate their captives before executing them.
Opponents of the Shah
الجمعة، 28 يوليو 2017
Onward with the Iranian Resistance, regime change is within reach paris...
MEK, MaryamRajavi, PMOI, FreeIran, Iran
الخميس، 27 يوليو 2017
New US Sanctions Blacklist Iran's IRGC
 |
New US Sanctions Blacklist Iran's IRGC |
- WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 05: Rep. Elliot Engel (D-NY) speaks during a news conference discussing new legislation on U.S. policy toward Russia April 5, 2017 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. U.S. Also pictured is Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA). (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)
The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill Tuesday placing new sanctions on Iran, North Korea and Russia. This follows a similar version adopted overwhelmingly by the Senate in a 98-2 vote last month.
The House resolution, however, faced a more peculiar road even riddled with obstacles. Fortunately, the overwhelming 419 to three vote in favor of this bill, the bipartisan Countering Adversarial Nations Through Sanctions Act (H.R.3364) has made it veto proof. Despite the fact of alterations made in the initial text, all glitches have been set aside to gain White House consent.
“The Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), not just the IRGC Quds Force, is responsible for implementing Iran’s international program of destabilizing activities, support for acts of international terrorism and ballistic missiles,” the House Resolution text reads in part.
This development is a devastating blow to Tehran and a major success for the Iranian opposition National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI).
What's Really Behind French Oil Giant's Deal With Iran?
 |
What's Really Behind French Oil Giant's Deal With Iran? |
The $4.8-billion-dollar deal between Iran and France's Total, the huge multinational oil and gas company, has become very controversial. Considering the unilateral U.S. sanctions and increasing measures against Iran, why has Total risked signing such a deal?
There are a variety of possibilities.
Total will be developing phase 11 of Iran's mammoth South Pars gas field, the largest in the world, along with a state Chinese firm and an Iranian subsidiary. The project is set to render 2 billion cubic feet of gas per day, equivalent to 400,000 barrels of oil.
Iran's domestic market will receive the supply in 2021. The first stage is set to cost $2 billion, with an end price of up to $5 billion and production forecasted to start within 40 months.
As we speak, however, Washington continues to impose sanctions on Tehran and the Trump administration's comprehensive Iran policy has yet to be defined. Therefore, why did Total accept such a risk?
The mullahs' regime has provided numerous concessions in this deal, leaving Total believing the risk is worth taking. Iran also may receive no compensation in the case of Total deciding to abandon the contract. Ten years ago a similar contract was signed between Iran and Total, ending in the French company pulling out and not paying a dime in compensation.
Total most likely also received guarantees on Tehran paying any possible financial fines. And finally, considering the silence seen from Washington over this deal, there lies a possibility of the Americans providing a green light for its brokering.
Needless to say, U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has emphasized that regardless of the policies adopted by Congress, the Trump administration will continue its own path of implementing sanctions on Iran.
The entire contract remains classified and the scenarios discussed above remain probabilities. What remains completely constant is the enormous scope of concessions provided by Iran. Rest assured all such actions were approved by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei himself.
This is exactly why he has remained silent despite all the disagreements and discussions inside the regime. Iran's parliament has canceled any and all discussions in this regard. When handling major policy matters, Khamenei has the final word, similar to how it is said he blessed the Iran nuclear deal in a mere 20 minutes.
Both Iranian regime factions need to launch a major brouhaha in this regard. Members of Khamenei's conservative faction refer to the faults in slamming the faction loyal to President Hassan Rouhani.
The Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) is the main party concerned in this regard, as the Total deal leaves it out of earning any direct revenue. The Rouhani faction also seeks to boast their success, especially after gaining nothing from the Iran nuclear deal.
Economically, this $4.8 billion deal only provides for 2.5 percent of Tehran's investment needs. In the next five years, Iran will need around $200 billion in investments, according to the Oil Ministry. This deal provides for the only 1/40th of the amount.
Iran will drop from an oil exporter to becoming an oil importer if around $150 to $200 billion foreign investing are not realized in the next decade, according to the Iranian Parliamentary Research Center.
For comparison, U.S. President Donald Trump's recent visit to Saudi Arabia resulted in $380 billion in investments, consisting of $110 billion in arms contracts. However, they never went the limits to boast these feats as Iran has gone with a mere $5 billion deal.
NOTORIOUS ALI FALLAHIAN REVEALS SECRETS OF IRAN'S 1988 MASSACRE
 |
NOTORIOUS ALI FALLAHIAN REVEALS SECRETS OF IRAN'S 1988 MASSACRE |
INU - Iran’s intelligence minister during Rafsanjani’s presidency back in the early 90s, Ali Fallahian, known for his role in the elimination of many dissidents, has recently made shocking allegations regarding mass executions, especially those targeting members and supporters of the Iranian opposition People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK).
Charges were raised against Fallahian by a German court for his involvement in the assassination in September 1992 of Iranian Kurdish dissidents in Berlin. Interpol placed Fallahian on its most wanted list for his role in the 1994 bombing the AMIA in Buenos Aires Jewish center that left 85 killed in 2007.
In this past year inside Iran, a major issue for the general public, especially the younger generation who are beginning to demand answers, is the 1988 massacre of over 30,000 political prisoners, mostly MEK members and supporters. Aired in a recent interview, Fallhian’s remarks have caused a stir in social media inside Iran, and in Iranian communities abroad. In this interview, Fallahian reveals his role in the Iranian regime’s enmity against the MEK.
Following are some remarks from this interview:
Q: “Can we blame only the MEK for taking up arms, or did we also make mistakes… for example, attack their gatherings, pressure their members and supporters…?”
Fallahian: “They had such an analysis. [Iranian opposition leader Massoud] Rajavi had maybe written 36 articles against armed conflicts.” (Khazar website – July 18) This is Fallahian acknowledging the fact that the MEK had sought to continue their peaceful political activities. The mullahs’ regime, however, dispatched their forces to attack, arrest, torture and kill MEK members. Fallahian moves on to discuss the 1988 mass executions across Iran.
Q: “Did the Intelligence Ministry suggest the 1988 executions to [Iranian regime founder Ruhollah] Khomeini?”
Fallahian: “Khomeini himself ordered it… saying the ruling for all moharebs [term used for MEK members, meaning enemies of God] is execution. There were discussions in this regard back then. Mr. Mousavi Tabrizi believed there was no need for prosecution, arguing prosecuting those who are at war with us has no meaning. Others believed those arrested should be prosecuted… however, [Khomeini] constantly emphasized to beware they don’t slip out of your hands… [Khomeini] would always say be careful in this regard… how? For example, if there was a confusion about someone being a murderer or not, execution would not be the first option of punishment. However, about the MEK [Khomeini] would say an opposite approach is needed. I know them, he would say, they must not slip away and their rulings are execution. This was his constant ruling, before and after the 1988 issue…
“… There are discussions and some are asking why were those sentenced to prison terms again condemned to death? First of all, keep in mind their rulings are execution, even if a judge hadn’t ruled for an execution, he had violated the law… If an armed mohareb was arrested, his/her ruling would be execution, even if he/she hadn’t killed anyone… the ruling for a hypocrite (another term used for MEK members) and mohareb is execution. This was [Khomeini’s] fatwa. There was no discussion in this regard. In 1988… the discussion reached the point that all of them must be executed, even those not sentenced to death. [Khomeini] would ask why you have still kept them alive.”
During the past year, the Iranian opposition launched a justice movement to shed light on the 1988 massacre both inside Iran and across the globe. Their efforts went into high gear in the weeks before Iran’s May 19th presidential election, and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei lost his bid to have conservative cleric Ebrahim Raisi, known to be Khamenei’s preferred candidate, replace the incumbent Hassan Rouhani as president. Raisi was defeated following revelations about his role in the 1988 massacre when he was a member of the four-man “Death Commission” appointed by Khomeini to facilitate the execution process.
Q: “Raisi was in the commission. Who were the other members?”
Fallahian refrains from naming other Death Commission members and begins discussing the process which political prisoners were executed and the summer 1988 massacre. He placed all the blame on Khomeini, who had issued the execution and massacre ruling.
Fallhian: “Yes, the poor guy [referring to Raisi] insisted he hadn’t issued the ruling, the ruling was issued in advance… but no one would listen, and they would also think the executed were innocent… if we hadn’t killed them there would be no country today. These are not my words; they are the words of [Khomeini]…”
The interviewer refers to an audio file unveiled last September of Khomeini’s then successor, the late Hossein Ali Montazeri, in which he sheds light on unknown aspects of the 1988 massacre.
Q: “What was Mr. Montazeri’s mistake?”
Fallahian: “He came in disagreement with [Khomeini]… [He] believed history would judge these executions against Islam and us. He would say it would be better to refrain, as when the enemy begins to write, they won’t cite us harshly. However, [Khomeini] ordered to carry out your religious duty and don’t wait for history’s judgement.”
Q: “Were all those executed arrested while armed?”
Fallahian: “No, not all of them were involved in the armed revolt. However, many of them were living in team houses. We would go there and find only one or two weapons, or arrest them on the street without any arms.”
Q: “So how were they linked to the armed revolt?”
Fallahian: “Well, they were part of the organization.”
Q: “Wasn’t it necessary for each individual to have taken up arms to be convicted of being a mohareb?”
Fallahian: “No, when someone is a member of an armed current, the individual being armed or not, their ruling is mohareb.”
Q: “Even if they are arrested with a newspaper?”
The interviewer is talking about the fact that many MEK members and supporters were arrested, and eventually executed, for merely having a pro-MEK newspaper in their possession.
Fallahian: “Yes. They were part of that organization and were operational. Now, its possible someone would merely buy bread for those living in ‘team houses’, another would, for example, procure other necessary items. They were all involved.”
Fallahian then refers to the role of the MOIS in dispatching its spies abroad under various pretexts. He says, “… we do not dispatch an intelligence officer, let’s say to Germany, the US or Russia, and there he would say, ‘well, I am from the Ministry of Intelligence, please provide me your information.’ (They would do it) under the cover of business or media jobs. Many journalists are intelligence agents ... A journalist is not paid well, so he needs to work with an intelligence service.”
Efforts by the Iranian opposition through its vast network of brave activists inside the country and abroad have forced the regime to discuss their role in the executions carried out during the horrific summer of 1988, nearly three decades later. Now, the international community must demand the facts, and bring the perpetrators to justice.
Lights of Liberty on the 30th Anniversary of 1988 Massacre
 |
Lights of Liberty on the 30th Anniversary of 1988 Massacre |
Rabat – In the summer of 1988, 30,000 Iranian political prisoners, supporters of the People’s Mujahedin of Iran, were massacred. As the 30th-anniversary approaches, the families of the victims and the citizens of Iran still await justice and an international tribune.
Thousands of Iranian political prisoners were systematically executed during a state-sponsored, five month-long killing spree in 1988. The prisoners, some as young as 14 years old, were killed in groups—loaded onto trucks and hanged from cranes. Over the past three decades, the regime has blocked all attempts at investigating the extent of the massacre. They have gone to great lengths to conceal the truth about the murders, including damaging cemeteries with bulldozers and toppling the headstones that mark the martyrs’ graves
There is neither a single government institution nor criminal justice system to deter crime and enforce a penal code in Iran. The Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, controls everything. He sets the tone and direction of Iran’s domestic and foreign policies and has allowed many former members of the “Death Commission” to remain in power. Figures like Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi and cleric Ebrahim Raisi are heavily involved in contemporary Iranian politics. The former is presently the minister of justice under President Hassan Rouhani’s Administration and the latter was the Supreme Leader’s in the 2017 presidential election—both have defended the government’s actions starting on July 19, 1988.
How blood of innocents has become an endless nightmare for Iranian regimeHow blood of innocents has become an endless nightmare for Iranian regime
 |
How blood of innocents has become an endless nightmare for Iranian regime |
In Iran, 1980s is known as a bloody decade as thousands of political opponents were executed in brutal mass murder.
الأربعاء، 26 يوليو 2017
خوف النظام الإيراني من تصنيف قوات الحرس كمنظمة إرهابية
 |
خوف النظام الإيراني من تصنيف قوات الحرس كمنظمة إرهابية |
18/7/2017
هدد النظام الإيراني أمس الاثنين على لسان أحد قادة قوات حرسه، الولايات المتحدة خوفا من احتمالية تصنيف قوات الحرس الإرهابي باعتباره منظمة إرهابية وفرض عقوبات جديدة على النظام.
وأكد مسؤولون أميركيون، في وقت سابق من هذا العام، أن إدارة الرئيس دونالد ترامب تدرس مقترحا قد يقود إلى احتمال تصنيف قوات الحرس الإيراني باعتباره منظمة إرهابية.
وأيد مجلس الشيوخ الأمريكي، في منتصف يونيو الماضي، فرض عقوبات جديدة على النظام الإيراني، بسبب برنامجها للصواريخ الباليستية وأنشطة أخرى لا تتعلق بالاتفاق النووي الدولي الذي توصلت إليه مع الولايات المتحدة وقوى عالمية أخرى في عام 2015.
وينبغي أن يقر مجلس النواب التشريع الجديد وأن يصدق عليه الرئيس دونالد ترامب ليصبح قانونا.
وأكد مسؤولون أميركيون، في وقت سابق من هذا العام، أن إدارة الرئيس دونالد ترامب تدرس مقترحا قد يقود إلى احتمال تصنيف قوات الحرس الإيراني باعتباره منظمة إرهابية.
وأيد مجلس الشيوخ الأمريكي، في منتصف يونيو الماضي، فرض عقوبات جديدة على النظام الإيراني، بسبب برنامجها للصواريخ الباليستية وأنشطة أخرى لا تتعلق بالاتفاق النووي الدولي الذي توصلت إليه مع الولايات المتحدة وقوى عالمية أخرى في عام 2015.
وينبغي أن يقر مجلس النواب التشريع الجديد وأن يصدق عليه الرئيس دونالد ترامب ليصبح قانونا.
إقرار مشروع قانون عقوبات جديدة على نظام الملالي وتسمية قوات الحرس بالارهاب في مجلس النواب الأمريكي
 |
إقرار مشروع قانون عقوبات جديدة على نظام الملالي وتسمية قوات الحرس بالارهاب في مجلس النواب الأمريكي |
تم التصويت على مشروع قرار من قبل الحزبين لفرض عقوبات جديدة على نظام الملالي وتسمية قوات الحرس بالارهاب يوم الثلاثاء 25 يوليو بـ419 صوتا مقابل 3 أصوات معارضة فقط. لتنتقل الكرة الى مجلس الشيوخ الذي يتعين عليه اقرار النص بشكل نهائي كي يحيله الكونغرس الى البيت الابيض للمصادقة عليه.
وقال رئيس لجنة الشؤون الخارجية في مجلس النواب اد رويس في الجلسة: هذا المشروع يأتي ضد كل من ينتهك حقوق الانسان ويضيف العقوبات بسبب دعم النظام الايراني للارهاب وبرامجه للصواريخ البالستية.
عقوبات جديدة على الملالي وتصنيف قوات الحرس بالارهاب خطوة ضرورية باتجاه صحيح يجب اكتمالها بخطوات أخرى
 |
عقوبات جديدة على الملالي وتصنيف قوات الحرس بالارهاب خطوة ضرورية باتجاه صحيح يجب اكتمالها بخطوات أخرى |
ترحب المقاومة الإيرانية بتبني اللائحة القانونية في مجلس النواب الأمريكي لفرض عقوبات جديدة على نظام الملالي لانتهاكه حقوق الانسان وتصنيع وتطوير الصواريخ البالسيتية وتسمية قوات الحرس كيانا إرهابيا، وتراها خطوة ضرورية باتجاه تصحيح سياسة المداهنة المخربة، يجب أن تكتمل بخطوات أخرى منها طرد قوات الحرس والميلشيات التابعة لها لاسيما من سوريا والعراق والاعتراف بحق الشعب الايراني في اسقاط نظام الملالي.
وكان من المفترض أن يتم هذا التصنيف وفرض العقوبات على قوات الحرس منذ مدة طويلة كون قوات الحرس هي الحافظة للنظام الفاشي الديني الحاكم في ايران برمته وهي الجهة الرئيسية لفرض القمع وتصدير الارهاب والتطرف الى المنطقة والوصول الى السلاح النووي والصواريخ البالستية. ان خامنئي وخلال 28 عاما مضى قد وضع القسم الأكبر من ثروات الشعب الإيراني وموارده تحت تصرف قوات الحرس. كما ان معظم اقتصاد إيران تم هضمه من قبل قوات الحرس.
وكان من المفترض أن يتم هذا التصنيف وفرض العقوبات على قوات الحرس منذ مدة طويلة كون قوات الحرس هي الحافظة للنظام الفاشي الديني الحاكم في ايران برمته وهي الجهة الرئيسية لفرض القمع وتصدير الارهاب والتطرف الى المنطقة والوصول الى السلاح النووي والصواريخ البالستية. ان خامنئي وخلال 28 عاما مضى قد وضع القسم الأكبر من ثروات الشعب الإيراني وموارده تحت تصرف قوات الحرس. كما ان معظم اقتصاد إيران تم هضمه من قبل قوات الحرس.
إن لائحة «قانون 2017 لمواجهة نشاطات إيران المزعزعة للاستقرار» تضع قوات الحرس في قائمة الإرهابيين العالميين الخاصة Specially Designated Global Terrorists طبقا لأمر رئاسة الجمهورية رقم 13224.
وتنص هذه اللائحة القانونية على أن «الادارة الأمريكية يجب عليها أن تفرض بعد تحويل اللائحة إلى القانون أن العقوبات خلال 90 يوما على كل الافراد والكيانات الإيرانية والخارجية ”من مسؤولين وعناصر موالين لقوات الحرس“». ويتم تجميد أرصدة الافراد المشمولين المدرجة أسمائهم في القائمة في أمريكا ويمنع المواطنون الأمريكيون من الصفقات المالية معهم. لا يحق لأي فرد أو شركة أمريكية أن يقيم علاقات مالية وتجارية وخدمية مع أي من الكيانات والافراد المرتبطين لقوات الحرس مباشرة أو غير مباشرة وأن يخرق هذه العقوبات.
إن المقاومة الإيرانية وخلال العقدين الماضيين قد أكدت باستمرار وباصدار عشرات الكتب والكراسات والمقالات والمؤتمرات الصحفية دور قوات الحرس في القمع وتصدير الإرهاب والتطرف و مشروع صناعة القنبلة النووية وطالبت بادراجها في القوائم السوداء. ومنها يمكن الاشارة الى كتاب «قوات الحرس، جيش التطرف والارهاب» بقلم السيد مهدي ابريشمجي رئيس لجنة السلام في المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الايرانية و«قوات الحرس،الامبراطورية الاقتصادية» و«مخيمات تدريب الأعمال الارهابية في ايران» و«كيف يزود النظام الايراني الحرب السورية بالوقود» من اصدارات ممثلية المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الايرانية في الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية حيث تحتوي على تفاصيل دقيقة باللغتين الانجليزية والفرنسية بشأن كيفية وأداء قوات الحرس.
وكانت السيدة رجوي قد أعلنت في 22 فبراير 2010 أنه «يجب إدراج قوات الحرس وكل الشركات والمؤسسات التابعة لها التي تستحوذ على القسم الأكبر من اقتصاد إيران في قائمة الإرهاب وتفرض عليها عقوبات كاملة».
كما أعلن المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الإيرانية في 24 مارس 2017 يجب تصنيف قوات الحرس وجميع الأجهزة التابعة لها وهي الآلة الرئيسية للقمع الداخلي وتصدير الإرهاب والتطرف إلى المنطقة والعالم، في قائمه الإرهاب في أسرع وقت وفرض العقوبات عليها. إدخال أي اعتبار سياسي يؤدي فقط إلى تشجيع النظام على التمادي في تدخله العسكري وتصدير الأزمة إلى المنطقة.
وفي الأول من أيار 2017 قال المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الإيرانية «بعد مضي 38 عامًا من أعمال الجريمة والإرهاب داخل وخارج إيران، آن الآوان لمحاسبة الحرس من قبل الشعب الإيراني وتطبيق العدالة. فأول خطوة ضرورية هي تصنيف الحرس في قوائم الإرهاب للأمم المتحدة والولايات المتحدة والاتحاد الاوروبي ودول المنطقة وفرض عقوبات شاملة عليها. والخطوة الضرورية الأخرى يجب طرد هذا الذراع لنظام ولاية الفقيه المكلف باثارة الحروب وارتكاب الجريمة من جميع دول المنطقة و بشكل خاص من سوريا والعراق واليمن ولبنان. وهذا هو الطريق الوحيد لتحقيق السلام والهدوء في المنطقة».
وتنص هذه اللائحة القانونية على أن «الادارة الأمريكية يجب عليها أن تفرض بعد تحويل اللائحة إلى القانون أن العقوبات خلال 90 يوما على كل الافراد والكيانات الإيرانية والخارجية ”من مسؤولين وعناصر موالين لقوات الحرس“». ويتم تجميد أرصدة الافراد المشمولين المدرجة أسمائهم في القائمة في أمريكا ويمنع المواطنون الأمريكيون من الصفقات المالية معهم. لا يحق لأي فرد أو شركة أمريكية أن يقيم علاقات مالية وتجارية وخدمية مع أي من الكيانات والافراد المرتبطين لقوات الحرس مباشرة أو غير مباشرة وأن يخرق هذه العقوبات.
إن المقاومة الإيرانية وخلال العقدين الماضيين قد أكدت باستمرار وباصدار عشرات الكتب والكراسات والمقالات والمؤتمرات الصحفية دور قوات الحرس في القمع وتصدير الإرهاب والتطرف و مشروع صناعة القنبلة النووية وطالبت بادراجها في القوائم السوداء. ومنها يمكن الاشارة الى كتاب «قوات الحرس، جيش التطرف والارهاب» بقلم السيد مهدي ابريشمجي رئيس لجنة السلام في المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الايرانية و«قوات الحرس،الامبراطورية الاقتصادية» و«مخيمات تدريب الأعمال الارهابية في ايران» و«كيف يزود النظام الايراني الحرب السورية بالوقود» من اصدارات ممثلية المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الايرانية في الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية حيث تحتوي على تفاصيل دقيقة باللغتين الانجليزية والفرنسية بشأن كيفية وأداء قوات الحرس.
وكانت السيدة رجوي قد أعلنت في 22 فبراير 2010 أنه «يجب إدراج قوات الحرس وكل الشركات والمؤسسات التابعة لها التي تستحوذ على القسم الأكبر من اقتصاد إيران في قائمة الإرهاب وتفرض عليها عقوبات كاملة».
كما أعلن المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الإيرانية في 24 مارس 2017 يجب تصنيف قوات الحرس وجميع الأجهزة التابعة لها وهي الآلة الرئيسية للقمع الداخلي وتصدير الإرهاب والتطرف إلى المنطقة والعالم، في قائمه الإرهاب في أسرع وقت وفرض العقوبات عليها. إدخال أي اعتبار سياسي يؤدي فقط إلى تشجيع النظام على التمادي في تدخله العسكري وتصدير الأزمة إلى المنطقة.
وفي الأول من أيار 2017 قال المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الإيرانية «بعد مضي 38 عامًا من أعمال الجريمة والإرهاب داخل وخارج إيران، آن الآوان لمحاسبة الحرس من قبل الشعب الإيراني وتطبيق العدالة. فأول خطوة ضرورية هي تصنيف الحرس في قوائم الإرهاب للأمم المتحدة والولايات المتحدة والاتحاد الاوروبي ودول المنطقة وفرض عقوبات شاملة عليها. والخطوة الضرورية الأخرى يجب طرد هذا الذراع لنظام ولاية الفقيه المكلف باثارة الحروب وارتكاب الجريمة من جميع دول المنطقة و بشكل خاص من سوريا والعراق واليمن ولبنان. وهذا هو الطريق الوحيد لتحقيق السلام والهدوء في المنطقة».
أمانة المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الإيرانية – باريس
25 يوليو/تموز 2017
الأحد، 23 يوليو 2017
ANALYSIS: Unveiling the secrets of Iran’s 1988 massacre
 |
ANALYSIS: Unveiling the secrets of Iran’s 1988 massacre |
Ali Fallahian, Iran’s intelligence minister during the tenure of Rafsanjani’s presidency back in the early 90s, is a name most notoriously known for his role in a series of chain murders across the country that saw the elimination of many dissidents.
A democratic alternative to the Iranian regime – 'Free Iran' rally highlights MEK's role in Iranian resistance
 |
| A democratic alternative to the Iranian regime – 'Free Iran' rally highlights MEK's role in Iranian resistance |
During the 'Free Iran' rally in Paris on July 1, the mood was festive and clearing upbeat, as speakers discussed the movement of MEK members from Iraq to Albania.
But many of the speakers and delegations also spoke of the real possibility of regime change in Iran, as they noted major changes on the international scene. Speaker after speaker from the United States pointed to the new policies of the Trump administration, while others acknowledged the Obama administration for its efforts to remove the MEK from the terrorist list.
Still, the highlight of the event was the keynote address by Maryam Rajavi, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) President-elect. She noted that there was an alternative to the current regime and its extremism.
"Since last July, the Iranian Resistance has hoisted the banner of seeking justice for the victims of the massacre of political prisoners 29 years ago, turning it into the main focus of political discourse in Iran today," said Rajavi.
FORMER INTELLIGENCE MINISTER TALKS ABOUT 1988 MASSACRE OF MEK PRISONERS IN IRAN
 |
FORMER INTELLIGENCE MINISTER TALKS ABOUT 1988 MASSACRE OF MEK PRISONERS IN IRAN |
By INU Staff
INU - Ali Fallahian, a former Intelligence Minister of Iran, participated in an interview with Tarikh Online – a state-affiliated news website, earlier this month. He admitted that the Supreme Leader at the time, Ayatollah Khomeini, ordered the execution of anyone linked to the Iranian opposition (MEK) in a fatwa in 1988.
During the summer of 1988, more than 30,000 political prisoners, most of whom were members or supporters of the People’s Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (PMOI or MEK), the main Iranian opposition group, were executed.
He said that the fatwa ordered the execution of the MEK members who insisted on maintaining their beliefs. To deal with the logistics of it, a commission was formed, he said. This is what has become known as the “Death Commission”. Fallahian said that the purpose of the commission was in actual fact to see who would be pardoned instead of being executed.
He explained that the people could have escaped execution by saying that they no longer hold their beliefs and do not support the MEK or any other opposition. If they declared their commitment to the Supreme Leader they would have remained alive.
Ali Fallahian: Khomeini ordered all MEK members to be executed in Iran's 1988 massacre
Mr. Hossein-Ali Montazeri released an audio recording of him warning the other members of the death commission about what they were partaking in. He said that such an act would go down in history as an unforgettable and horrific event. He was also concerned that it was not a good image of Islam. Fallahian said that he also clashed with Khomeini on other matters, and he was instructed to carry out his religious duties, in this case to participate in the 1988 massacre, without any regard for “history’s judgement”.
The Iranian regime has commented that the people who were executed in 1988 were armed when they were arrested, but Fallahian explained that this was not the case. Not all of the people who died were part of armed rebellion activities. Fallahian said that they did not distinguish between those who were armed and those who were not – if they were faced with a member of the MEK then they were treated as if they were armed.
The interviewer, clearly shocked by what they were hearing, asked Fallahian to clarify what he said. They asked him that if someone was carrying a MEK newspaper, would they have been arrested. Fallahian said yes, because they were part of the MEK.
The people of Iran are still waiting for justice despite repeated calls by the international community.
Iran, MEK, Maryam Rajavi, PMOI, NCRI, Iranian Opposition)
 |
منظمة (مجاهدي خلق)
الإيرانية كانت من أولى الحركات السياسية في إيران التي أعلنت موقفها بشأن حقوق
الشعوب الإيرانية وحقوق الإثنيات والقوميات، وذلك منذ أول يوم وصل فيه نظام
الملالي إلى السلطة.
هناك بعض من تسوّل له نفسه
لتجاهل هذه الحقائق واتهام حركة المقاومة الإيرانية التي كانت سبّاقة في هذا
المجال بشهادة التاريخ الإيراني الحديث، بأنها لا تعترف بحقوق الشعوب وحتى يسمح
لنفسه أن يستغلّ الإعلام للتهجّم على المقاومة الإيرانية فى هذا المجال وأن يقول على
سبيل المثال "إن مجاهدي خلق يمارسون العنصرية الخمينية نفسها ضد أهلنا في
الأحواز المحتلة"!
ولا نريد إطلاقاً أن ندخل
باب الملاسنة لمن يكتب أو يتحدث بشكل لا ينفع سوى نظام الملالي، لكن نرى من واجبنا
تجاه شعبنا وأهلنا في الأحواز وفي كردستان وبلوتشستان وغيرها وكذلك لكل من
المخلصين من الإخوان العرب أن نشرح مواقف المقاومة الإيرانية حتى لا يبقى أدنى شكّ
بأن هذه المقاومة كانت ولاتزال وستبقى مدافعة لحقوق جميع أبناء الشعب بكافة
أعراقهم وأجناسهم وأديانهم ومذاهبهم أينما كانوا.
السبت، 22 يوليو 2017
الجمعة، 21 يوليو 2017
الاشتراك في:
الرسائل (Atom)